I never heard Biden, or anyone else for that matter, promise a $2600 relief payment. What I heard was a total of $2000, meaning another $1400 on top of Trump's $600, and that is what Biden is still promising to deliver. Also, what is the definition of "immediate"? You seem to fault Biden for not delivering $2000 checks, on top of the $600, on Jan. 6, 2 weeks before he became president. Anyone who understands how Congress works knows that bill take time to pass, checks take time to print & mail, even direct deposits take time, and a bill passed with only 51 votes is a longer process. "Immediately" must always be consider in context. If a friend in NYC says they are coming to LA immediately, I don't expect to hang up, open my door and find her standing there.
Also your use of a dictionary instead of the constitution to define impeachment is unfortunate and opportunist. Clearly, you oppose the trial of Trump for attempting to void the election, but Trump was impeached while in office, so all your ridiculous parallels re: Andrew Jackson and all, remain misleading and ridiculous. The question is, can he be allowed to avoid trial thanks to Moscow Mitch's delays. Please address that question, and not your fabrication.
I never heard Biden, or anyone else for that matter, promise a $2600 relief payment. What I heard was a total of $2000, meaning another $1400 on top of Trump's $600, and that is what Biden is still promising to deliver. Also, what is the definition of "immediate"? You seem to fault Biden for not delivering $2000 checks, on top of the $600, on Jan. 6, 2 weeks before he became president. Anyone who understands how Congress works knows that bill take time to pass, checks take time to print & mail, even direct deposits take time, and a bill passed with only 51 votes is a longer process. "Immediately" must always be consider in context. If a friend in NYC says they are coming to LA immediately, I don't expect to hang up, open my door and find her standing there.
Also your use of a dictionary instead of the constitution to define impeachment is unfortunate and opportunist. Clearly, you oppose the trial of Trump for attempting to void the election, but Trump was impeached while in office, so all your ridiculous parallels re: Andrew Jackson and all, remain misleading and ridiculous. The question is, can he be allowed to avoid trial thanks to Moscow Mitch's delays. Please address that question, and not your fabrication.